<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dora and Eliza converse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hyperrhiz.net/symposium/2007/07/07/dora-and-eliza-converse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hyperrhiz.net/symposium/2007/07/07/dora-and-eliza-converse/</link>
	<description>Electronic Literature Symposium 2007</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 20:26:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blog Comment Poster</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperrhiz.net/symposium/2007/07/07/dora-and-eliza-converse/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Comment Poster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 07:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperrhiz.net/symposium/?p=26#comment-49</guid>
		<description>To be honest, all this stuff about  sounds confusing for me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest, all this stuff about  sounds confusing for me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davin</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperrhiz.net/symposium/2007/07/07/dora-and-eliza-converse/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>davin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 18:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperrhiz.net/symposium/?p=26#comment-18</guid>
		<description>&quot;But what &lt;em&gt;is,&lt;/em&gt; qualitative judgement?  In the Turing test hypothesis, where is the qualitative judgement about intelligence located?  Is it the &lt;em&gt;analyst&lt;/em&gt;, for example, who makes the judgement or is it the &lt;em&gt;analyst&lt;/em&gt; (the very condition of analyst as the possessor of some agency, instrumental intelligence, and therefore--why not?--humanity) who becomes a subject of &lt;em&gt;being-judged&lt;/em&gt;, or rather of being &lt;em&gt;placed in question&lt;/em&gt; (not by an ego, but simply by a conspiracy of protocols)?&quot;
--Armand, Louis. &lt;em&gt;Literate Technologies&lt;/em&gt;.  Prague: Litteraria Pragensia, 2006. 129.

Helen, you should track down a copy of Louis&#039; book (or email him).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But what <em>is,</em> qualitative judgement?  In the Turing test hypothesis, where is the qualitative judgement about intelligence located?  Is it the <em>analyst</em>, for example, who makes the judgement or is it the <em>analyst</em> (the very condition of analyst as the possessor of some agency, instrumental intelligence, and therefore&#8211;why not?&#8211;humanity) who becomes a subject of <em>being-judged</em>, or rather of being <em>placed in question</em> (not by an ego, but simply by a conspiracy of protocols)?&#8221;<br />
&#8211;Armand, Louis. <em>Literate Technologies</em>.  Prague: Litteraria Pragensia, 2006. 129.</p>
<p>Helen, you should track down a copy of Louis&#8217; book (or email him).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.275 seconds -->
